> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://help.jupico.com/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://help.jupico.com/disputes/dispute-evidence-best-practices.md).

# Dispute Evidence Best Practices

When a cardholder disputes a purchase as unauthorized, misrepresented, or damaged, you have the right to counter their claim by providing supporting evidence. Our goal is to assist merchants in defending themselves. Below are some best practices to aid you:

## Organize the evidence

Before you submit evidence to counter a dispute, you should abide by the following guidelines:

* **Present chronologically:** Organize evidence in the order events occurred to create a clear timeline of the transaction and subsequent communications.
* **Group by type:** Separate receipts, communications, policies, and system logs into distinct sections for easier reference.
* **Include summaries:** Provide brief explanations of what each piece of evidence demonstrates to guide the reviewer.
* **Maintain clarity:** Ensure all of the text is readable and that images are clear, with sufficient contrast and resolution

## Keep evidence relevant to the dispute reason and to the point

Card issuers handle numerous manual dispute responses daily. Lengthy explanations don't increase persuasiveness, and irrelevant evidence, such as a return policy for a claim of non-receipt, can confuse the argument. It's crucial to maintain clarity and conciseness, clearly stating why a claim is invalid and supporting it with appropriate evidence, while maintaining a neutral, professional tone. Including too little evidence weakens your case, while an overload of information may obscure key points.

For example:

*John Smith placed a to-go order from our company on \[date] using a Visa credit card. He came into our store on \[date/time] to pick up his to-go order, as shown in the proof of order pickup provided, so the claim that the product was not received isn’t true.*

## Limit evidence file length

Along with keeping your evidence factual, professional, and concise, the size of your files is also important to keep in mind. Card issuers will not comb through lengthy files to sort through out the relevant evidence relating to the chargeback reason code.

For example, if the dispute network reason code indicates “Canceled Merchandise”, but the customer didn’t comply with your cancellation policy, you should not submit your entire Terms and Conditions agreement. Instead, upload only the relevant cancellation policy section and use a callout or arrow to emphasize the details their customer violated.

You can also decrease file size by:

* Reducing font size
* Single spacing documents
* Shrinking images within PDFs

## Include proof of customer authorization

Fraudulent disputes make up a significant portion of all disputes. To effectively counter these claims, it's crucial to present evidence that the cardholder was aware of and authorized the transaction. Essential elements to include in a compelling response are:

* [x] AVS (Address Verification System) matches
* [x] CVV (Card Verification Value) confirmations
* [x] Signed receipts or contracts
* [x] IP address that matches the cardholder’s verified billing address

## Include proof of service and delivery

Another high frequency dispute reasons often include:

* Claims that products or services were not delivered
* Delivered items were defective or unsatisfactory
* Items were not as described

#### How to Refute Claims

**For Physical Merchandise:**

* Provide proof of shipment and delivery that includes the full delivery address, not just city and postal code.
* For orders with a “Ship to” name different from the purchaser, offer documentation explaining the difference, as this is common for gift purchases but can be a dispute risk.

**For Digital Goods:**

* Include evidence such as an IP address or system log showing the customer downloaded or used the service.

## Include a copy of your terms of service and refund policy

In the event of disputes, the fine print is crucial. For returns or refunds, it's essential to show proof that the customer agreed to and understood the terms of service at checkout, or failed to follow the policies. Include a clear screenshot of your terms of service presentation during checkout, with the relevant policy highlighted.&#x20;

However, avoid including the full text of your policy, as card issuers won't sift through it to find the pertinent details.

## Misunderstandings

For disputes arising from misunderstandings, your customer can inform their card issuer that they no longer wish to contest the transaction. However, we still recommend submitting evidence to validate the payment and to ensure the card issuer knows you are not accepting the dispute.

If you agree that the customer should retain the disputed funds, accept the dispute instead of having the cardholder withdraw it for a regular refund. Remember, card networks assess based on the number of disputes received, not on how many you win or lose—a withdrawn dispute still counts as a dispute.

{% hint style="info" %}

Questions or need more explanation please email our Support Team at <support@jupico.com>.
{% endhint %}


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://help.jupico.com/disputes/dispute-evidence-best-practices.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
